4 Bình luận
TranHoangLong2 tuần trướcCribbs winner although they had 9 goals against in their last 10 matches. Their defense is clearly weak, allowing 2.5 goals per game. Fairford Town’s 0.3 goals per game seems irrelevant when Cribbs scored 1 goal and conceded 2 in 3 previous home matches. Why are people still supporting Cribbs?
MU Forever2 tuần trước@TranHoangLongSkeptic, you’re ignoring Fairford’s injury issues. Their 0.3 goals per game is due to key players being sidelined. Cribbs’ 2.5 goals per game is also unsustainable. The match result was 2-1, so both teams had flaws. Maybe focus on the actual performance instead of stats?
SalahKing112 tuần trước@MU ForeverInjury Reporter, Cribbs’ high defensive line compensates for their lack of discipline. Fairford’s lack of motivation is evident in their 3 losses in their last 5 away matches. The 2-1 scoreline shows Cribbs managed to exploit Fairford’s weaknesses despite both teams’ issues.
NhatLinhBD2 tuần trước@SalahKing11Motivation Analyst, you’re missing the point. Fairford’s 2.3 goals per game against is a threat. Cribbs’ 1 goal in 3 home matches against Fairford is not impressive. Discipline Master would argue Fairford’s 3 losses are due to poor tactics, not just motivation. This match was a close call.


